Every year, African governments spend billions of dollars acquiring goods, works, and services. Yet a fundamental question remains: how much of these resources actually reach their intended beneficiaries? The problem is rarely a lack of resources. It is often the weakness of governance mechanisms.
Every year, African governments spend billions of dollars acquiring goods, works, and services to support the economic and social development of their populations. Roads, schools, hospitals, energy infrastructure, water supply systems — all investments made through public procurement.
According to various international estimates, public procurement represents a significant share of African economic activity, reaching 15 to 20% of GDP in several countries and exceeding one-third of GDP in some low-income economies. This makes public procurement one of the main drivers of economic development, job creation, and improvement of public services.
Yet a fundamental question remains: how much of these resources actually reach their intended beneficiaries? After years of field experience on projects financed by the World Bank, the African Development Bank (AfDB), and various African governments, one truth stands out: the problem is rarely a lack of resources. It is often the weakness of governance mechanisms.
During several technical assistance missions, I observed projects with adequate funding but facing significant delays due to insufficient planning, incomplete documentation, or inadequate control mechanisms. These situations illustrate that resource availability is not always the main challenge; their governance often remains the determining factor in a project's success or failure.
"Good governance in public procurement is not a bureaucratic constraint. It is the lever that ensures public money truly reaches the citizen."
Good governance can be defined as the set of mechanisms, rules, practices, and behaviors that ensure effective, transparent, accountable, and equitable management of public affairs.
In the context of public procurement, it aims to ensure that purchasing decisions are made in the public interest, in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, while optimizing the use of public financial resources.
Good governance is not limited to procedural compliance. It also rests on a culture of accountability, integrity, and professional ethics shared by all actors involved in the procurement process. International organizations, multilateral development banks, and technical and financial partners now consider it one of the main indicators of public management quality.
1. Transparency
Transparency is one of the essential foundations of public governance. It requires that information related to public procurement be accessible to relevant stakeholders: publication of tender notices, evaluation criteria, procedure results, and contract award decisions.
Transparency strengthens the confidence of businesses, citizens, and investors in public institutions, while reducing the risks of favoritism, fraud, and corruption. With the emergence of electronic procurement platforms, many African countries are making significant progress in this area.
2. Fairness and Competition
Good governance requires that all suppliers have equal access to the opportunities offered by public procurement. Fairness implies the absence of discrimination and the application of identical rules to all bidders.
Healthy competition allows public administrations to obtain the best available offers on the market, while fostering innovation and quality improvement. When competition is limited or distorted, public bodies risk paying more for goods or services of lesser quality.
3. Accountability
Public officials must be able to justify their decisions and account for their actions. Every decision made in a procurement process must be explainable, documented, and verifiable.
Accountability fosters more rigorous management of public resources and strengthens citizen trust in institutions. Audit mechanisms, internal control, and external oversight play an essential role in reinforcing this accountability.
4. Effectiveness and Efficiency
The ultimate objective of public procurement is to meet users' needs while obtaining the best value for money. Effectiveness means achieving the set objectives, while efficiency means optimizing the use of available resources.
A high-performing administration must be able to acquire necessary goods and services within the required timeframes, at the appropriate cost, and to the expected quality standards. This dimension is particularly critical in a context where public resources are limited and development needs remain considerable.
5. Integrity
Integrity is arguably the most important pillar of good governance. It implies honesty, impartiality, professional ethics, and respect for established rules. Procurement professionals must avoid any situation that could create a real or apparent conflict of interest.
A culture of integrity helps prevent fraudulent practices and protect the public interest. It is built over time through training, exemplary leadership, and the implementation of detection and sanction mechanisms.
Integrity also manifests in day-to-day situations: management of gifts and benefits, conflict of interest prevention, information confidentiality, and impartiality in bid evaluation. Organizations that invest in a culture of integrity significantly reduce their risks of non-compliance and disputes.
Without solid governance, public procurement becomes fertile ground for harmful practices:
Tenders tailored for favored suppliers, to the detriment of the most qualified bidders.
Vague evaluation criteria that open the door to arbitrariness and corruption.
Undocumented decisions that cannot be audited or challenged.
Significant cost overruns, considerable delays, or complete project failures.
Deficient infrastructure due to poor contract management or insufficient supervision.
In the long run, poor governance discourages investors, weakens public institutions, and erodes citizens' trust. It is always the most vulnerable populations who bear the cost.
Practical Example
In several African countries, infrastructure projects financed by international partners experienced significant delays due to disputes over bid evaluation or insufficient documentation of decisions. In most cases, these difficulties could have been reduced through better process traceability and more transparent communication with stakeholders.
Digital transformation offers exceptional opportunities to improve public procurement governance. Electronic procurement systems automate several stages of the acquisition process while strengthening transparency and traceability.
Digital platforms facilitate:
Publication of tenders and their accessibility to a greater number of bidders.
Electronic submission of bids, reducing physical interactions that may favor irregular practices.
Evaluation of offers based on standardized and traceable criteria.
Secure archiving of documents and production of performance reports.
Countries such as Rwanda — the first African country to deploy an end-to-end e-procurement system at the national level — and Côte d'Ivoire with its recent ARCOP reform demonstrate that modernizing procurement systems is not only achievable, but delivers concrete results.
However, digitalization is not a miracle solution. It must be accompanied by capacity building for users, adequate cybersecurity risk management, and continuous improvement of regulatory frameworks to ensure the reliability and security of electronic systems.
A sound governance system does not only define rules — it must also guarantee effective and accessible recourse channels for aggrieved bidders.
In Francophone Africa, these mechanisms exist and are embedded in community law. The WAEMU Directive No. 05/CM/UEMOA of 2005 provides for two successive levels of recourse: first, a gracious appeal before the contracting authority, then a hierarchical appeal before its superior. Independent regulatory bodies have jurisdiction to receive and rule on supplier complaints. In Côte d'Ivoire, the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (ARCOP), established by Ordinance No. 2025-32 of January 15, 2025 to replace the ANRMP, now exercises this regulatory and recourse function.
In Côte d'Ivoire, data reported by the public procurement regulatory body indicate that the mandatory preliminary appeal resolved more than one-third of disputes at the contracting authority level. In Senegal, the 2022 reform now allows administrative court proceedings within 15 days of an ARCOP decision.
Note: The figure of 36.4% is reported in analyses of the Ivorian system. Readers wishing to consult the primary source are invited to refer to the reports and publications of the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (ARCOP), established by Ordinance No. 2025-32 of January 15, 2025 to replace the ANRMP.
These advances are real and deserve recognition. Nevertheless, the day-to-day effectiveness and accessibility of these mechanisms remains a work in progress. Governance requires not only that rules exist, but that they are known, applied, and respected by all actors.
The quality of a governance system depends largely on the competencies of the people who implement it. Procurement specialists occupy a strategic position in the management of public resources.
They must not only master procedures and regulations, but also possess skills in planning, market analysis, risk management, negotiation, and contract management. Professionalizing the function is therefore a major challenge.
Professional certifications, continuing education, and adherence to ethical codes strengthen practitioners' capacity and improve the overall performance of procurement systems. In an increasingly complex environment, public buyers must evolve toward a strategic advisory role capable of creating value for their organizations.
Good governance is not an end in itself. It is a means of creating more effective, transparent, and accountable institutions. When rigorously applied, it improves the quality of public infrastructure, strengthens citizen confidence, attracts investment, and supports sustainable economic growth.
For African countries, public procurement represents an exceptional opportunity to stimulate local development, foster innovation, and create jobs. However, this opportunity can only be fully realized if the principles of good governance are integrated at every level of the decision-making process.
Public procurement is evolving rapidly under the influence of globalization, digital transformation, and growing sustainability requirements. Public organizations will need to address several key challenges:
Integration of artificial intelligence into procurement processes.
Cybersecurity of electronic platforms.
Sustainable and responsible public purchasing.
Supply chain resilience.
Strategic risk management.
Institutions that anticipate these developments will be better positioned to create value and effectively meet citizens' expectations.
In a context marked by growing needs in infrastructure and public services, good governance in public procurement stands as one of the most important pillars of sustainable development in Africa.
Transparency, fairness, accountability, efficiency, and integrity are not merely theoretical principles. They are the foundations of modern public management capable of producing concrete results for citizens.
Governments, public institutions, development partners, and procurement professionals all have a role to play in promoting these values. The future of African public procurement will largely depend on the capacity of all actors to build high-performing, accountable procurement systems oriented toward value creation.
"Investing in public procurement governance is investing in the future of our nations."
At Procumap International, we are convinced that capacity building, professionalization of actors, and the dissemination of best governance practices are essential levers for building stronger institutions and contributing sustainably to the development of the African continent.
REFERENCES / BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. OECD (2015). OECD Recommendation of the Council on Public Procurement. Paris: OECD Publishing. 🔗 www.oecd.org/governance/ethics/oecd-recommendation-on-public-procurement.htm
2. World Bank (2021). Procurement for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. 🔗 www.worldbank.org/en/topic/procurement-for-development
3. African Development Bank — AfDB (2021). Africa Procurement Activity Report 2015–2020. Abidjan: AfDB. 🔗 www.afdb.org
4. United Nations — Africa Renewal (2016). The Opportunity of Public Procurement in Africa. New York: UN. 🔗 www.un.org/africarenewal
5. WAEMU (2005). Directive No. 05/CM/UEMOA of 9 December 2005 on the Control and Regulation of Public Procurement. Ouagadougou: WAEMU Commission.
6. Republic of Côte d'Ivoire (2025). Ordinance No. 2025-32 of January 15, 2025 establishing the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (ARCOP). Abidjan: Official Gazette.
7. Republic of Senegal (2022). Reform of the Public Procurement Code. Dakar: DCMP. 🔗 www.dcmp.sn
8. World Bank (2020). Assessment of the Public Procurement System — Rwanda. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. 🔗 openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33977
procumapinternational.com
#PublicProcurement #Governance #Transparency #Integrity #AfricaDevelopment #ProcumapInternational
Armand Tehia
Armand Tehia, PMP® · CPPB® Procurement Expert
PROCUMAP Assistant